COST ACTION 920

Inventory of QMRA Studies in Europe


Data sheet

Pathogen

Salmonella Typhimurium (STM)

Country or region

 UK

Transmission route

 From

 Pig

To

 Human

Specific product(s)

Pork, Bacon, Sausages

End-point(s)

Risk of human with STM from the consumption of pig meat products.  Proportion of human STM cases attributable to pig meat


Reports or publications

Bibliographic reference

Hill, A.A., England, T.J. Snary, E.L., Kelly, L. A., Cook, A.J.C., Wooldridge, M. (2003).  A ‘farm-to-consumption’ risk assessment for the adverse effects to human health of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs.  Centre for Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Veterinary Laboratories Agency.  Report to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). 

Hill, A.A., England, T.J. Snary, E.L., Kelly, L. A., Cook, A.J.C. & Wooldridge, M (2003).  A ‘farm-to-consumption’ risk assessment for the adverse effects to human health of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs. Proceedings of the 10th International symposium for veterinary epidemiology and economics (ISVEE). Vina-del-Mar, Chile.
17th – 21st November, 2003

Abstract

Salmonella Typhimurium is the most common serotype of Salmonella in British pigs.  It was unknown what proportion of human STM cases are attributable to the consumption of pig-meat and whether one form of pig-meat, e.g. bacon or pork, poses a higher risk to consumers than others. Therefore, a farm-to-consumption risk assessment was developed to estimate the risk of illness from consumption of pork, bacon and sausages containing pig meat.  Also, the contribution of pig meat consumption to the overall burden of STM illness was estimated. 

Using the typical farm-to-consumption approach, the risk assessment was split into six distinct modules, each representing a separate part of the production chain.  These included Farm, Transport, Slaughter & Procsessing, Retail & storage, Preparation & Consumption and Human Effect (Dose response).  The first five modules completed the exposure assessment, where the prevalence and microbial load of STM infection/contamination of pigs and pig meat products through the production chain were estimated.  The risk was characterised by combining the exposure assessment with the hazard characterisation (Human Effect module).

Results show that the risk of illness per serving varies between pig-meat products and exposure route (cross-contamination of hands/chopping boards or ingestion of inadequately cooked pig meat).  When comparing the mean risk of illness per serving cross-contamination of hands/chopping boards from preparing pork cuts posed the greatest risk (mean risk of illness per serving 9.14*10-7, which translates to 1 in every million servings causing illness). The lowest risk was for the consumption of inadequately cooked bacon (mean risk of illness per serving 1.8*10-10, which is equivalent to 1 in every 5 billion servings causing illness).

The expected number of cases of STM originating from pig-meat per year was estimated from the mean risk of illness per serving for each pig-meat product by each of the two exposure routes (i.e. undercooking and cross-contamination) and the level of consumption of those products.  This suggested that approximately 30% of all STM cases are attributable to pig-meat.  However, this estimate should be treated with caution since good quality consumption data for pig-meat products was one of the data deficiencies identified by the MRA.

This work was funded by Defra.

Status

 Completed

Availability

 From author


Project group

Institute

Veterinary Laboratories Agency, UK

Contact person

 Andy Hill (a.hill@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk)

Partners